Key Takeaways
- AHPRA and the 16 National Boards have revised the common Criminal history registration standard. It takes effect on 15 July 2026, replacing the 2015 standard, and applies to every registered health practitioner and applicant across all 16 professions.
- An advance copy was published on 30 April 2026 alongside a new Guide to the application of the criminal history registration standard. AHPRA describes the amendments as minor and evidence-based, with minimal practical impact on most practitioners.
- The revised standard adds an explicit statement that a person cannot have a criminal history that is incompatible with registration, making the compatibility test a clear threshold rather than an implied one.
- The standard now separates an offence's nature from its gravity. An offence treated as minor by a court can still be highly relevant in a health-care context, so a low sentence no longer signals a low regulatory concern.
- A new factor directs decision-makers to consider the impacts of racism and systemic inequity on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and how those factors may have shaped an individual's criminal history.
- The definition of criminal history under section 5 of the National Law is unchanged and remains broad: every conviction, every finding or plea of guilt whether or not a conviction was recorded, and every charge, in Australia or overseas. Spent convictions are not automatically excluded.
- The standard governs how AHPRA assesses practitioners. It does not replace a practice's separate pre-employment screening duties, such as NDIS worker screening, Working with Children Checks and aged care screening, which continue to apply in their own right.
AHPRA and the National Boards have revised the common Criminal history registration standard, effective 15 July 2026. The changes are described as minor and evidence-based: an explicit statement that a criminal history can be incompatible with registration, a split between an offence's nature and its gravity, a new First Nations equity factor, and a companion application guide. The underlying assessment approach is largely unchanged.
For most registered practitioners with no criminal history, nothing changes in practice. The value in reading the revised standard now is understanding how the Boards actually weigh a disclosed offence, what must be declared, and where the 2026 amendments shift the emphasis. For practice managers who recruit and credential practitioners, it is a chance to check that your onboarding and declaration processes line up with the current standard rather than the 2015 version.
What is the criminal history registration standard?
The Criminal history registration standard is one of the mandatory registration standards made by the National Boards under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law. It sets out how a National Board considers an applicant's or registered practitioner's criminal history when making a registration decision. Because it is a common standard, the same document applies across all 16 professions that AHPRA regulates, from medicine and nursing to physiotherapy, psychology, optometry and paramedicine.
The standard does two things. It defines what counts as criminal history, drawing on the definition in section 5 of the National Law, and it lists the factors a Board weighs when deciding whether a person's criminal history is relevant to their suitability to hold registration. It is important to be clear about what the standard is not: it is not an automatic bar. Having a criminal history does not, by itself, prevent registration. The Board applies the factors to the individual circumstances and decides whether the history is incompatible with holding registration in the profession. The current standard page hosts both the 2015 version and the revised 2026 version during the transition.
What changes on 15 July 2026?
The revised standard is a refinement, not a rewrite. AHPRA reviewed the 2015 standard to keep it evidence-based, remove duplication, close content gaps and align it with contemporary regulatory practice. The substantive shifts are set out below.
| Area | 2015 standard | Revised standard (from 15 July 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Compatibility test | Implied through the assessment factors | Explicit statement that a practitioner cannot have a criminal history that is incompatible with registration |
| Nature vs gravity | Nature and gravity considered together | Nature of an offence considered separately from its gravity, so a court-classified minor offence can still carry high regulatory weight |
| First Nations equity | Not addressed | New factor: consider the impacts of racism and systemic inequity on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and the effect on an individual's criminal history |
| Students | Limited guidance | Clarified how the standard applies to students in approved programs of study |
| Juvenile offending | General treatment | Clarified how serious juvenile offending is handled |
| Decriminalised offences | Considered as a factor | Clarified treatment, with a dedicated definitions section |
| Application support | Standard only | New Guide to the application of the criminal history registration standard published alongside |
The most consequential change for anyone assessing risk is the separation of nature from gravity. Under the old approach, a modest sentence tended to read as a modest concern. The revised standard makes explicit that while the criminal justice system may treat an offence as minor, the fundamental nature of the behaviour may still be highly relevant in a health-care setting where practitioners work with vulnerable people. A conviction that attracted a small fine can still be treated as serious for registration purposes.
The First Nations equity factor is genuinely new. It directs decision-makers to take into account the documented impacts of racism and systemic inequity on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, and the implications those factors may have had on an individual's criminal history, when weighing that history. It is a contextual factor in the assessment, not an exemption.
The companion Guide to the application of the standard is worth reading in its own right. It expands on the purpose of each requirement and explains how an applicant or registered practitioner can meet the standard, which the 2015 document left largely to inference.
What criminal history must you declare to AHPRA?
The definition of criminal history is broad and has not changed. Under section 5 of the National Law it captures every conviction for an offence, whether recorded in Australia or overseas and whether before or after the commencement of the Law; every plea of guilty or finding of guilt by a court, whether or not a conviction was recorded; and every charge made against the person for an offence. That reach surprises practitioners: findings of guilt without a recorded conviction, and charges that did not proceed to a finding, both still form part of criminal history for this purpose.
Two practical points follow. First, spent convictions are not automatically excluded. Spent conviction schemes limit disclosure in many everyday contexts, but the National Law scheme allows the Boards to obtain and consider a practitioner's full history through the criminal history check process. Second, the obligation is ongoing. Applicants consent to a national criminal history check at registration, and practitioners with relevant overseas residence may also undergo an international check. Registered practitioners must then notify AHPRA of any change to their criminal history, including a new charge, within seven days under section 130 of the National Law. Waiting for the annual renewal declaration is not sufficient.
If you are unsure whether something needs to be declared, the safe course is to declare it and let the Board apply the standard. Non-disclosure of a relevant matter is itself a conduct concern, often treated more seriously than the underlying offence.
Does a criminal record prevent AHPRA registration?
No, not by itself. A criminal record is one input the Board assesses against the standard's factors, not an automatic disqualifier. The standard lists the matters a National Board considers when deciding whether a person's criminal history is relevant to their suitability to hold registration.
| Factor the Board considers | What it looks at |
|---|---|
| Nature and gravity of the offence | The type of conduct and its seriousness, now weighed separately, and its relevance to the practice of the profession |
| Time elapsed | How long ago the offence was committed or alleged |
| Finding or charge status | Whether a conviction or finding of guilt was recorded, or whether a charge is still pending |
| Ages involved | The age of the practitioner, and of any victim, at the time |
| Decriminalisation | Whether the conduct has since been decriminalised |
| Sentence imposed | The penalty the court ordered |
| Conduct since | The practitioner's actions after the offence, including insight and remediation |
| Ongoing risk | The likelihood of a future threat to a victim or the public |
| Supplementary material | Any additional information the practitioner provides |
| First Nations context | The impacts of racism and systemic inequity for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander practitioners |
The Board weighs these together against the overriding question the revised standard now states plainly: is the criminal history incompatible with registration. An offence with no bearing on safe practice, committed long ago, followed by evidence of insight and no further offending, sits very differently from recent conduct that goes to the heart of patient trust. The relevance to health practice is the thread that runs through the whole assessment.
How are decriminalised, spent and juvenile offences assessed?
The revised standard tightens the wording in three areas that generated questions under the 2015 version, and adds a definitions section so the terms are used consistently.
Decriminalised offences remain an express factor. Where the conduct that constituted an offence has since been decriminalised, that is relevant to how much weight the history carries, though decriminalisation does not automatically erase the history from consideration. Serious juvenile offending is clarified rather than reweighted: offending as a minor is considered in the context of the practitioner's age at the time, which the factors already capture, but the standard now spells out how serious matters are treated so decisions are consistent across Boards. For students, the revised standard clarifies how it applies to people in approved programs of study, which matters for the health services and universities that place students in clinical settings.
None of these clarifications lowers the bar. They make the existing approach more transparent, which is the recurring theme of the 2026 review: the same assessment, explained more clearly, with the compatibility threshold and the nature or gravity distinction made explicit.
What does the new standard mean for practices and employers?
Be honest about the scope. The Criminal history registration standard governs how AHPRA assesses a practitioner, not a duty it places on employers. A practice does not administer this standard, and the revision does not create a new obligation on you to run additional criminal history checks. The register you rely on for verification is unaffected in its mechanics.
That said, there are three practical implications worth acting on. First, if your onboarding pack references the criminal history registration standard, or your position descriptions and declaration forms quote it, update those references to the 15 July 2026 version so your documentation is current when an assessor or auditor looks at it. Second, use the revision as a prompt to confirm your pre-employment screening is sound, because it is separate and continues to apply: NDIS worker screening, Working with Children Checks and aged care screening each run under their own rules and are not covered by the AHPRA standard. Third, keep verifying and tracking registration itself, since a serious criminal history matter can result in conditions, suspension or cancellation that appear on the register between renewal cycles, which is exactly what your registration tracking process exists to catch.
There is also a link to your notification duties. If a conduct concern about a practitioner involves criminal behaviour connected to their practice, that may cross into notifiable conduct under section 140, which is a separate obligation from anything in the criminal history standard. Our guide to mandatory notifications covers when that threshold is reached. The criminal history standard and the notification framework operate side by side: one governs registration decisions, the other governs when you must report.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the criminal history registration standard?
It is a mandatory registration standard made by the National Boards under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law. It defines what counts as criminal history and lists the factors a Board weighs when deciding whether a practitioner's or applicant's criminal history is relevant to their suitability to hold registration. It is a common standard applying to all 16 registered health professions.
What changes on 15 July 2026?
The revised standard adds an explicit statement that a criminal history can be incompatible with registration, separates consideration of an offence's nature from its gravity, and introduces a factor on the impacts of racism and systemic inequity for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander practitioners. It also clarifies students, serious juvenile offending and decriminalised offences, adds a definitions section, and comes with a new application guide.
Does a criminal record prevent AHPRA registration?
No. A criminal record is not an automatic bar. The Board assesses the history against the standard's factors, including the nature and gravity of the offence, its relevance to practice, how long ago it occurred, the sentence, the practitioner's conduct since, and any ongoing risk. It then decides whether the history is incompatible with registration in that profession.
What criminal history must I declare to AHPRA?
Criminal history under section 5 of the National Law is broad: every conviction, every finding or plea of guilt whether or not a conviction was recorded, and every charge, in Australia or overseas. Spent convictions are not automatically excluded. Registered practitioners must notify AHPRA of a change to their criminal history, such as a new charge, within seven days, not only at renewal.
How are decriminalised or juvenile offences assessed?
Both remain factors in the assessment rather than automatic exclusions. Where conduct has since been decriminalised, that reduces the weight the history carries but does not remove it from consideration. Offending as a minor is weighed in the context of the practitioner's age at the time, and the revised standard now spells out how serious juvenile matters are handled so decisions are consistent across Boards.
Do employers need to do anything?
The standard governs AHPRA's assessment, not an employer duty, so it creates no new screening obligation. Practically, update any onboarding or declaration documents that quote the 2015 standard, confirm your separate pre-employment screening (NDIS worker screening, Working with Children Checks, aged care screening) is current, and keep verifying and tracking registration so any resulting conditions or suspensions are caught between renewal cycles.
Part of
AHPRA & Registration